SWBI surged after reporting fiscal Q4 earnings that beat expectations and showed nearly 27% year-over-year revenue growth. The stock broke out across the hourly, 4-hour, daily, and weekly charts before consolidating and pulling back toward key exponential moving averages. This SWBI case study demonstrates how EMA retracements can improve risk-reward without rushing into trade strong earnings-driven trends.

---

SWBI Earnings Results

Smith & Wesson Brands reported fiscal fourth-quarter earnings of $0.36 per share on $178.39 million in revenue.

Revenue increased 26.73% year-over-year, while management highlighted improvements in profitability, cash flow generation, debt reduction, and market share gains across multiple product categories.

CEO Mark Smith commented that the company delivered strong results across every major area of the business and emphasized the strength of the company’s balance sheet, brand recognition, and long-term growth strategy.

The earnings report sparked immediate buying interest, causing SWBI to surge roughly 14% during the first hourly earnings candle.

---

---

The Initial Breakout

The first hourly earnings candle gained approximately 14%, pushing SWBI through resistance levels across multiple timeframes simultaneously.

The move represented a breakout on the:

• Hourly chart
• 4-hour chart
• Daily chart
• Weekly chart

Multi-timeframe breakouts are often among the strongest technical signals because they attract buyers operating on different trading horizons.

For traders using my post-earnings momentum strategy or any similar strategy, the goal is to trade in the direction of the initial earnings move once strong momentum has been established.

For me, I often aim to enter at the close of the hourly earnings candle. In the case of SWBI’s post-earnings move, the close of this candle would have generated a long entry near $15.59.

---

---

The Post-Earnings Momentum Entry

One important observation from this trade is that there really never is a “perfect” entry.

Traders who entered near $15.59 at the close of the earnings candle still captured the majority of the move, while traders who waited for a pullback toward the exponential moving averages had an opportunity to enter closer to $15.10.

Since SWBI eventually traded as high as roughly $17.50, both approaches could have produced gains of more than 10%.

If you had entered at the close of the earnings candle, the trade would have seen a maximum favorable excursion (MFE) of 12.3% and a maximum adverse excursion (MAE) of roughly -3.3%.

Meanwhile, if you had gotten long nearer $15.10 at the pre-market low, you would have seen a MFE of 16.2% and a negligible adverse move.

---

This highlights an important reality of earnings trading: Price action after earnings is often messy, volatile, and unpredictable.

Waiting for a pullback can improve risk-reward, but it can also result in missed opportunities if the stock never retraces. On the other hand, entering immediately can capture more momentum, but it may leave traders more vulnerable to sharp reversals.

Rather than searching for the perfect entry, traders are often better served by focusing on position sizing, risk management, and emotional discipline, which ultimately have a far greater impact on long-term performance than a few cents on an entry price.

---

The EMA Retracement Opportunity

After the initial breakout, SWBI began consolidating and retracing toward its short-term exponential moving averages.

At its deepest point, the pullback provided a potential entry near $15.10, approximately 3% lower than the original momentum entry at the close of the hourly earnings candle.

While the difference may seem small, it can meaningfully improve risk-reward ratios.

Here’s a look at how both entry points would have impacted trade results.

The pullback did not dramatically increase profits, but it reduced risk while maintaining essentially the same upside target.

In most cases, when trading my post-earnings momentum strategy, I aim for a stop-loss of 3-5% and a profit target of 9-10%.

When it comes to SWBI’s price action, whether you had entered at the close of the earnings candle or waited for a pullback, you still would have hit a +10% profit target, without suffering through more than a 1-3% drawdown depening on your actual fill price.

---

Using EMAs As Entries Or Stops

One of the most useful aspects of exponential moving averages is that they can serve two different purposes.

Option 1: Use The EMA As An Entry

Some traders wait for price to retrace toward the 9 EMA, 20 EMA, or another moving average before entering.

Personally, I like using the 6 EMA, 9 EMA, and 12 EMA since I typically trade short-term, intraday momentum. But traders should experiment with different moving average periods and adjust as needed.

Either way, the goal is to buy/sell closer to support/resistance rather than chasing strength.

---

---

Option 2: Use The EMA As A Stop Zone

I often enter immediately at the close of the earnings candle but watch my EMAs as a reference point for risk management.

If price decisively breaks below the moving averages, it may suggest that momentum is weakening and that the original thesis is no longer valid.

In SWBI’s case, both approaches would have produced a profitable trade.

---

---

Why The Pullback Worked

The key reason the retracement succeeded was that nothing about the original bullish thesis changed.

• Earnings results were strong
• Revenue growth exceeded 26%
• The fundamentals were bullish, which aligned with the technical price action
• Multi-timeframe breakout remained intact
• Volume remained elevated
• Buyers defended the moving averages

The pullback represented consolidation within an uptrend rather than a reversal. When conditions such as these are present, EMA retracements often provide attractive secondary entry opportunities.

---

Key Takeaways – SWBI Case Study

• SWBI gained roughly 14% during its initial earnings breakout.
• The move created breakouts on the hourly, 4-hour, daily, and weekly charts.
• A standard post-earnings momentum entry near $15.59 worked well.
• A later EMA pullback offered a slightly better entry around $15.10.
• Both entries could have achieved a 10% profit target.
• EMAs can be used as either entry zones or stop-loss reference points.
• The best entry is not always necessary; sometimes a good entry is enough.

That last takeaway is key because it directly addresses one of the biggest mistakes newer traders make: waiting for perfection and missing excellent trades altogether.

If you want to go deeper:

• Explore the Trading Statistics Hub to understand how different sectors behave across market cycles
• Study real setups inside the Trade Reviews section
• Learn the framework behind high-probability setups in the Post-Earnings Momentum Strategy

This is how you turn raw market data into repeatable trading edge.